OK, this is way off topic , but it might shed light on what happens to people when they don’t listen to enough banjo music.
They start to lose their minds.
For the record, if I ever referred to my wife as an “Egg producer” and not as Female, I would rapidly become extinct!
The world has lost it’s mind for sure. Makes me thankful that I live out in the woods away from everything 
Now that you confessed it, I expect a balloon to be in your territory soon! 
But you know what to do when you see it!
The term “scientists” is very misleading here and insulting to a large percentage of people who work in the field of science. Instead that term should be replaced with “a small group of people who somehow overcame their limited intellect to achieve an advanced degree so they could act superior when proposing stupid ideas.” 
Yeah. “Scientist” want to ban these terms. I’m sure.
@JKL is right on the money
No doubt there are people out there who want to do this are anarchist who want to redefine everything, because in that process they think they will come to power. They are crazy, but they ain’t stupid.
The only term that we need to stop using is “Social Scientist”.
Speaking of anarchist, they act under the color of law, and not under the law! Their strength comes from their beneficiaries! Here is what I bumped into today to make the distinction.
https://www.justice.gov/crt/deprivation-rights-under-color-law
So I would say, “Follow The Law!”
“The law is a ass, Sir!”
― Charles Dickens, Oliver Twist
OK, sometimes, a Statute (a Law) ----------------------> Not a Law.
A thing may be within the letter of the statute and yet not within the statute, because not within its spirit, nor within the intention of its makers.
https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/casebrief/p/casebrief-church-of-the-holy-trinity-v-united-states
By law, what I mean is what is within the constitution, the supreme law.
Being under rule of law (again under what?? ), you can’t simply discard law, as you know the implications are huge!
So, @BanJoe, does this address your point?
Maybe the color of law is what made him make such remark about the law??
“The (color of) law is a …, Sir!” ??
I’m not sure. It might confirm it.
lol.
OCD Me: frown
6 year old: What? Is coloring outside the lines against the law?
OCD Me: It’s not right.
6YO: But is it against the law?
OCD Me: sigh
6YO:
me: No, it’s not against the law.
6YO: resumes wildly scribbling
me: walks away
Possible God’s law violation from both end - provoking a child, disobeying a parent??
Were I to refer to my wife in such a manner, I may find myself “eggless”, if you know what I mean.
